The full comparison

SimpleSwap vs SwapSpace

Seven concrete points where the two products actually differ in practice, not seven ways of saying the same thing twice.

1 · Product model

Two different jobs, same starting point

SwapSpace is built as a comparison layer: enter a pair, and it queries partner exchanges for offers you can weigh against each other before picking one. SimpleSwap is built as a routing layer: enter a pair, and the service itself checks its 20+ CEX/DEX liquidity sources and selects one on your behalf. Neither shows you the other's internal process, so this is a genuine product-design difference, not a branding one.

2 · Rates

How each one actually picks a rate

Rates on both sides are live and move with the market, so neither is reliably "cheaper" at any given moment. Treat any snapshot comparison as expired the moment you read it. What's stable is the mechanism: SwapSpace surfaces each partner's quoted rate as a separate offer for you to compare, while SimpleSwap's routing picks a source and presents one resulting rate. On SimpleSwap, you additionally choose fixed (locks the price for 20 minutes) or floating (tracks the market) per swap; on SwapSpace, the rate type is set by whichever partner offer you select.

3 · Assets & networks

Coverage, not a ranking

SwapSpace lists roughly 3,950 coins across 600,000+ pairs, sourced from its 40+ partner exchanges. SimpleSwap lists 2,800+ assets across 3.2M+ pairs, sourced from its own 20+ liquidity providers. The two count assets differently because they aggregate differently: SwapSpace's figure reflects what its partners collectively list, while SimpleSwap's reflects what its routing can reach. Treat these as two separate methodologies, not a single apples-to-apples ranking.

4 · Account & KYC

Neither is a blanket "no KYC" product

Signing up isn't required to swap on either service. That's a separate question from verification: on SwapSpace, each partner exchange sets its own KYC likelihood, shown per offer before you pick it. On SimpleSwap, verification is triggered situationally, either by a fiat on-ramp partner's own KYC step or by a compliance-flagged crypto-to-crypto transaction, and an optional account with pre-verification is available at simpleswap.io/kyc. Neither product can promise KYC will never apply; it depends on the specific route or partner involved in that swap.

5 · Swap flow

Where the two flows branch

Same starting action, two different paths after that.

Start: pick a pair e.g. BTC → ETH SwapSpace path SimpleSwap path Offers listed From 40+ partner exchanges You pick one Rate and KYC likelihood shown per offer That exchange executes Funds sent to your wallet Routing decides Checked across 20+ sources One source is used Not shown before the swap You receive funds Non-custodial pass-through
6 · Mobile, fiat & extras

Feature availability, checked directly

Verified separately for each product rather than assumed from web parity.

Feature availability, verified separately for each product
FeatureSwapSpaceSimpleSwap
Android appLiveLive
iOS appComing soonLive, redesigned 2026
Fiat on-rampMercuryo, Simplex, GuardarianMercuryo, Simplex, Guardarian
Loyalty / cashbackNFT-based “Invader” programOptional Loyalty Program (account)
Embeds / API for other appsEmbeddable comparison widget6,000+ partner integrations
7 · Practical trade-offs

What you're actually trading

Neither column is the "better" one here. Each trait cuts differently depending on what you want from a swap.

Who picks the provider

You do, from a list of offers
The routing layer does, on its own

What you see before swapping

Every offer's rate, speed and KYC likelihood
One resulting rate, source not disclosed

Steps to complete a swap

Compare offers, then confirm one
Confirm the pair, routing does the rest

Where else you'll find it

Embedded as a comparison widget on partner sites
Embedded inside 6,000+ wallets and apps, including Exodus and Tangem

The last row isn't a like-for-like count: SwapSpace doesn't publish a partner-integration figure, so the comparison is between a documented number and an unquantified one, not a size ranking.

See what reviewers actually said

User reviews, independent videos, and how each one's own review sources hold up.

Open reviews